(364) Abortion: Genesis of an Authoritan Shift in 2022

Abstract Introduction Access to abortion is questioned in the USA. The debate crystallizes form of a confrontation between pro and anti clans. Is it possible get away from this rhetoric consider that question access care? Abortion social fact described since Antiquity, for reason, States have duty accompany applicants. Reducing dialectic or against linguistic maneuver generating emotional activation opposing human rights. Can scientific research be an explanatory factor constructions relating abortion? Our study proposes put into perspective end decriminalization with gender asymmetry analysis reproductive health, particular concerning induced abortion. Objective as abortion's right inequality according Methods we conducted literature review 07/2021 06/2022 keywords men women introduced on Pub Med: 86 articles are referenced men, 10 which relevant. 1698 references 1310 criterion relevance reference Results shows reproductiv health overwhelmingly favor women. studying man whose ephemeral partner not confronted constitutes less than 1% Remember regard woman each participate equally fertilization Conclusions Conclusions: work questions imperativ egalitarian treatment genders particularly Gender iinequalities could perform heteronormativ frameworks, power relations discrimination construction symbolic representations. This dynamic socio-scientific inequalities field law, assigning most vulnerable situation violates rights gender, namely domination versus women, has strong impact developpement frameworks fertility sexuality: place central sexual HIV, contrary marginalized excluding almost entire mechanism. Birth control existed ancient times, by means, people match societies limited resources environment order create sustainable world all living species including species. logic, contraceptive techniques sometimes fail: forcing person pregnancy, physically, psychologically socially constraining, involves risks overall serious attack democratic principles guaranteeing people's freedom Disclosure No